The Supreme Court of the United States has reshaped the balance of power in one of the world’s most consequential economic rivalries, striking down sweeping tariffs imposed by U.S. President Donald Trump and potentially strengthening Beijing’s hand ahead of a high-stakes summit with Chinese leader Xi Jinping.
In a ruling delivered last week, the court said Trump had improperly relied on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify broad tariffs on imports. The decision curtails the executive branch’s ability to deploy emergency powers as a blanket trade weapon and introduces fresh uncertainty into Washington’s strategy toward China.
The tariffs in question formed a significant portion of the duties imposed during the renewed trade tensions of the past year. Before the ruling, the United States had added a 20% levy on many Chinese goods comprising a 10% reciprocal tariff and another 10% tied to fentanyl-related concerns. Those measures were layered onto existing duties dating back to the earlier trade war, affecting hundreds of billions of dollars in trade flows.
According to estimates from Goldman Sachs, the ruling effectively reduces overall U.S. tariff rates on Chinese imports by around 5 percentage points on net. Given that annual U.S. imports from China stand at roughly $430 billion, even a modest reduction could translate into billions of dollars in cost relief for importers and potentially lower prices for American consumers.
Total goods trade between the United States and China reached approximately US$575 billion in 2025, underscoring the deep interdependence that persists despite political friction. U.S. exports to China were valued at about $145 billion, spanning agricultural products such as soybeans, as well as aircraft, energy shipments and industrial equipment. Beijing has historically used large-scale purchase commitments sometimes worth tens of billions of dollars as leverage in negotiations.
More Read
Trump is scheduled to visit Beijing from March 31 to April 2, marking the first trip by a U.S. president to China since 2017. Xi is expected to make a reciprocal state visit to Washington later this year. Analysts say the court’s decision may complicate Trump’s negotiating posture ahead of those meetings.
Without the full threat of expansive tariffs, Washington’s leverage could narrow. Beijing may now feel less pressure to accelerate purchases of U.S. farm goods or ease export restrictions on critical minerals such as rare earths, which are vital for global technology and defense industries. At the same time, China could push for the removal of remaining tariffs and seek concessions on broader strategic issues, including technology export controls and U.S. arms sales to Taiwan.
Still, the White House has signaled it is not abandoning tariffs altogether. Following the ruling, Trump invoked Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose a 10% global tariff, later raising it to 15%, which he said would take effect immediately. However, the scope and durability of those measures may face political and legal scrutiny.
More Read
Beyond tariffs, the United States retains powerful non-tariff tools. These include export controls on advanced semiconductors and artificial intelligence technologies, as well as sanctions targeting specific Chinese firms. Such measures carry structural implications for China’s long-term economic ambitions, particularly in high-tech sectors central to its industrial strategy.
China’s Commerce Ministry said it is assessing the impact of the court’s decision while reiterating calls for Washington to remove what it describes as unilateral trade barriers. Beijing maintains that cooperation would generate mutual gains, whereas prolonged confrontation risks undermining global economic stability.
Financial markets have responded cautiously. Some analysts see upside potential for Chinese exports in 2026 if tariff pressures ease, potentially supporting growth at a time when domestic demand remains uneven. Others warn that the broader strategic rivalry — encompassing trade, technology, security and geopolitics — remains intact.
As Trump and Xi prepare to meet, the Supreme Court’s ruling has altered the tactical landscape but not the fundamental tensions defining the U.S.-China relationship. The coming summit will test whether the world’s two largest economies can recalibrate their economic ties — or whether a temporary easing of tariffs merely sets the stage for the next phase of rivalry.
Tensions between the United States and China have taken a new turn after the Supreme Court of the United States struck down former President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs, a ruling that analysts say strengthens Beijing’s hand ahead of a high-stakes summit with President Xi Jinping.
In a landmark decision, the court ruled that Trump had wrongly invoked the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to justify broad-based tariffs on imports. The ruling effectively blocks the legal foundation for some of the most aggressive trade measures introduced during his administration and recalibrates the balance of power in ongoing trade negotiations.
More Read
Before the decision, Washington had imposed an additional 20% tariff on Chinese exports, made up of a 10% reciprocal tariff and a 10% tariff linked to fentanyl-related concerns. These were on top of earlier duties imposed during the height of the trade war. According to estimates by Goldman Sachs, the court’s ruling implies a net reduction of about 5 percentage points in U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods a shift that could amount to billions of dollars in reduced costs for Chinese exporters annually.
Trade between the two economic giants remains massive despite years of friction. In 2025, total goods trade between the United States and China stood at approximately US$575 billion. U.S. imports from China accounted for roughly $430 billion, while exports to China were about US$145 billion. Even marginal tariff adjustments can therefore translate into multibillion-dollar implications for companies and consumers on both sides.
Analysts say the court’s decision weakens Trump’s negotiating leverage just weeks before his planned visit to Beijing from March 31 to April 2 the first trip by a U.S. president to China since 2017. Xi Jinping is also expected to make a reciprocal state visit to Washington later this year, making the coming months critical for resetting the tone of bilateral relations.
With tariffs partially constrained, Beijing may seek concessions in other areas. Experts suggest China could press for reduced U.S. arms sales to Taiwan, eased technology export controls, and the removal of certain Chinese firms from U.S. sanctions lists. Taiwan remains one of the most sensitive flashpoints in U.S.-China relations, with Washington maintaining unofficial ties and arms support for the self-governed island.
Despite the setback, Trump has signaled he is not backing away from tariffs altogether. Following the ruling, he invoked Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose a 10% global tariff, later raising it to 15%, which he said would take immediate effect. A White House fact sheet indicated that the initial 10% tariff would begin on February 24 at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time, although further legal and political challenges remain possible.
Beyond tariffs, Washington still wields significant non-tariff tools. These include export controls on advanced semiconductors, restrictions on artificial intelligence technologies, and sanctions targeting Chinese technology firms. Such measures have structural implications for China’s long-term economic ambitions, particularly in high-tech manufacturing and digital innovation.
Meanwhile, China’s Commerce Ministry has said it is assessing the implications of the ruling while reiterating its position that the United States should remove all unilateral tariffs. Beijing maintains that cooperation benefits both economies, while confrontation harms global growth.
For global markets, the ruling introduces both relief and uncertainty. A reduction in tariff pressure could support Chinese exports in 2026, improve supply chain stability, and ease inflationary pressures in the United States. However, the broader strategic rivalry spanning trade, technology, security, and geopolitics remains firmly in place.
As Trump and Xi prepare to meet, the Supreme Court’s intervention has reshaped the negotiating landscape. While tariffs were once Trump’s most powerful economic weapon, Beijing now enters the summit with renewed confidence and, arguably, greater leverage in shaping the next phase of U.S.-China economic relations.
