For years, private equity firms, including heavyweights like Thoma Bravo, Vista Equity Partners and Apollo Global Management, built massive portfolios around software and Software‑as‑a‑Service (SaaS) companies, anchoring deals on predictable subscription revenues and strong growth multiples. That strategy accounted for roughly 40 percent of buyout deal activity over the last decade and underpinned about $440 billion in software acquisitions by private capital.
But the rapid rise of generative and AI‑native technologies is disrupting that logic, threatening valuations, weakening traditional SaaS moats, and forcing investors to reassess the very foundation of their software bets. Analysts and insiders say the era where subscription‑based SaaS companies were considered safe, stable bets may be ending as AI accelerates value creation in ways that sideline legacy software revenue models.
At a recent investor gathering in Toronto, Apollo executives stunned audiences by questioning whether perennial assumptions about software’s resilience still hold, with one describing the category as potentially “dead” in its old form under pressure from AI‑driven automation and new competitive dynamics.
Investors are already seeing the effects. The recent sell‑off in software stocks, sometimes dubbed a “SaaSpocalypse,” has erased hundreds of billions in market value as AI tools climb and enterprise buyers rethink long‑term commitments to legacy offerings.
The impact isn’t just theoretical. Deals that once sailed through underwriting on assumptions about sticky recurring revenues now face tougher scrutiny. Lenders and credit funds that backed leveraged software buyouts are marking down assets, wary that AI capabilities could erode competitive advantages faster than anticipated. Some funds have even reduced their software exposure significantly within months.
Private equity leaders are reacting in different ways. Some firms are doubling down on AI integration across portfolio companies, embedding machine learning to boost operations, automate due diligence, and sharpen valuation models, while others focus on highly regulated verticals where AI disruption is slower or where compliance creates natural barriers.
Others still argue that AI can be a tool for value creation rather than a threat, particularly if used to enhance enterprise products instead of replacing them entirely. But the underlying sentiment is clear: the old faith in software’s predictable subscription economics has been shaken, and private markets must adapt or risk writing down billions of dollars in once‑coveted assets.
US FTC raises concerns over claims Apple News suppresses right-leaning content
