Plans for a long-discussed undersea rail tunnel linking Spain and Morocco are advancing through feasibility studies, but the megaproject continues to face significant technical, financial and legal challenges, according to recent reports.
The proposed infrastructure, intended to cross the Strait of Gibraltar, would represent one of the most ambitious engineering projects ever attempted, connecting two continents via a subsea rail link stretching an estimated 42 kilometres.
Of that distance, around 27.7 kilometres would run beneath the seabed, with studies indicating depths of up to 300 metres in some sections, particularly around the Camarinal Threshold — the shallowest underwater ridge separating the Atlantic Ocean from the Mediterranean Sea.
The project is being overseen on the Spanish side by the state-owned company Secegsa, which has received multi-million-euro funding to carry out geological, seismic and engineering assessments. Further public investment was approved earlier this year to continue technical studies.
Preliminary estimates place the cost of the tunnel between €15 billion and €30 billion ($16.2 billion–$32.4 billion), though no final budget has been confirmed. Officials stress that the project remains in a pre-construction feasibility phase.
More Read
Engineering studies are currently focused on assessing seismic risks in the Strait of Gibraltar, where tectonic activity and strong underwater currents present major technical obstacles. Experts say these environmental conditions significantly increase construction complexity and long-term operational risks.
In addition to geological challenges, coordination between Spanish and Moroccan authorities remains a key hurdle. Differences in regulatory frameworks, construction standards and financing structures require extensive bilateral alignment before any construction phase can begin.
Another major constraint has been financial risk management. Reports indicate that efforts to secure insurance coverage for the project’s civil liability have so far failed, raising concerns about how risk would be allocated among stakeholders.
According to Spanish media reports, a tender to secure insurance for project executives was recently cancelled after no insurers submitted bids within the required timeframe. The coverage was intended to protect managers on both the Spanish and Moroccan sides from potential legal and administrative liabilities related to decision-making and project execution.
Despite these setbacks, feasibility studies continue, with engineers and planners working to determine whether the tunnel is technically viable under current conditions. Authorities involved in the project have not ruled out the possibility of future revisions to scope or design.
The tunnel concept has been discussed intermittently for decades, reflecting both its strategic appeal and persistent engineering challenges. If completed, it would dramatically reduce travel times between Europe and North Africa and potentially reshape trade, logistics and passenger transport routes across the region.
However, several analyses suggest that operational completion is unlikely before 2040, given the scale of preparatory work still required and the unresolved technical and financial issues.
Supporters of the project argue that it could serve as a transformative link between continents, boosting economic integration and mobility. Critics, however, caution that cost overruns, environmental risks and governance complexities could delay or derail the initiative.
For now, the Spain–Morocco tunnel remains a symbol of long-term ambition—balanced against the practical realities of engineering one of the world’s most complex undersea infrastructure projects.
